06 Jul 2009 - 03:06:07 am
Experience the law (4)
When debating the square team and telling witnesses, a teammate begins to cross-examine him, this witness is very uncooperative and avoiding all questions, unfortunately, the judge has not awarded either witnesses must answer the question. This teammate continues cross-examining, match rule overtime should deduct points. We all understand in the heart, in this case, can only give up this witness, then walk down. Because the last witness Netbook Wholesale|Netbook manufacturer|Netbook review|Netbook factory|Electronic Cigarette|Electronic CigaretteCheap Netbooks|Best Netbook|Buy Cheap Netbook|Red Netbook|White Netbook Kelly health defend lady whether we need, add, cross-examine severely really. Transmit the strip each other between two teammates, it is to continue cross-examining or letting him go to dispute. The problem is, only a person can make decision in the court according to the regulation, that teammate does not want to lose face because the witness has not answered his question. When the last witness' health defends ladies and is spread, only 4 minutes left for us, and our need in fact is 12 minutes! Have no option, we decide to leave the time restriction alone, continue cross-examining.
Fault of this time make us the failure. It's a pity, is just a difference to take a taxi for two teams each referee. If we have not wasted those 10 minutes, we are sure to win, while cross-examining last two witnesses, the referees all return taller fen to us. The teammate, with making us pay a price.
Finally, in more than 30 regional representative teams, we have obtained the ninth place the whole Texas match, that team that only won over us with difference slightly has obtained the first place Texas match. Technically, if referee have because we team deduct points overtime, perhaps we will get the first place of Quanzhou. This lesson gives us lesson one on the ground well. We have learnt that strengthen team unity, attend the importance of the goal together.
Daddy's comment:
Participate in state match come back, daughter sigh repeatedly, sorry to carry off the first at one blow. But regret, she behavior at front yard intoxicated with oneself for oneself too. Let she a proud one she in make last knot debate state, pairs of the immoral license of lawyer especially, mean for like from peanut syrup puffed rice Cracker Jack (one sweep U.S.A. little food well received for decades) The young thing childhood when is found in the box, the laugh on the box caused.
In the court with severe atmosphere, worldly-wise serving as and acting as an assessor of those experienced and knowledgeable, experience all kinds of
Relaxation after tense court debate
Person lawyer and judges afford to banter, last I fulfillment to realize her. She very proud because of the interlude, in busy interval after the match, lawyer, rub one's body with a towel out of date to forget, nod greetings to her laughingly yet with her by judge. Condemn case with such a metaphor the professional personal integrity of lawyer facilitate in the match " Score " Although is unable to find out, however, at the stage for study, mix history and culture, social knowledge and humour in the actual combat, so long as have a certain fulfillment, is encouraged by any form, all encourage enterprising motive force oneself.
Qian Gao under guide of me, resolve law of studying, work as lawyer, watch a lot of about law book and article of newspapers and periodicals while as a child. However, that is fighting only on paper.
16 year old come into court, participate in simulation court debate match, make her have an opportunity until oneself personally experience to law, further think deeply in life. Understand the detail that the law, court, lawyer and court hear a case tentatively, make her have an opportunity to personally experience, and in order to personally experience deeper introspection: Such work, such working environment, such a working rhythm, such life, it is exactly one's own ideal, whether pursue in one's own real one life?
The judicial procedure of American court competes with simulation to prove:
When debating the square team and telling witnesses, a teammate begins to cross-examine him, this witness is very uncooperative and avoiding all questions, unfortunately, the judge has not awarded either witnesses must answer the question. This teammate continues cross-examining, match rule overtime should deduct points. We all understand in the heart, in this case, can only give up this witness, then walk down. Because the last witness Netbook Wholesale|Netbook manufacturer|Netbook review|Netbook factory|Electronic Cigarette|Electronic CigaretteCheap Netbooks|Best Netbook|Buy Cheap Netbook|Red Netbook|White Netbook Kelly health defend lady whether we need, add, cross-examine severely really. Transmit the strip each other between two teammates, it is to continue cross-examining or letting him go to dispute. The problem is, only a person can make decision in the court according to the regulation, that teammate does not want to lose face because the witness has not answered his question. When the last witness' health defends ladies and is spread, only 4 minutes left for us, and our need in fact is 12 minutes! Have no option, we decide to leave the time restriction alone, continue cross-examining.
Fault of this time make us the failure. It's a pity, is just a difference to take a taxi for two teams each referee. If we have not wasted those 10 minutes, we are sure to win, while cross-examining last two witnesses, the referees all return taller fen to us. The teammate, with making us pay a price.
Finally, in more than 30 regional representative teams, we have obtained the ninth place the whole Texas match, that team that only won over us with difference slightly has obtained the first place Texas match. Technically, if referee have because we team deduct points overtime, perhaps we will get the first place of Quanzhou. This lesson gives us lesson one on the ground well. We have learnt that strengthen team unity, attend the importance of the goal together.
Daddy's comment:
Participate in state match come back, daughter sigh repeatedly, sorry to carry off the first at one blow. But regret, she behavior at front yard intoxicated with oneself for oneself too. Let she a proud one she in make last knot debate state, pairs of the immoral license of lawyer especially, mean for like from peanut syrup puffed rice Cracker Jack (one sweep U.S.A. little food well received for decades) The young thing childhood when is found in the box, the laugh on the box caused.
In the court with severe atmosphere, worldly-wise serving as and acting as an assessor of those experienced and knowledgeable, experience all kinds of
Relaxation after tense court debate
Person lawyer and judges afford to banter, last I fulfillment to realize her. She very proud because of the interlude, in busy interval after the match, lawyer, rub one's body with a towel out of date to forget, nod greetings to her laughingly yet with her by judge. Condemn case with such a metaphor the professional personal integrity of lawyer facilitate in the match " Score " Although is unable to find out, however, at the stage for study, mix history and culture, social knowledge and humour in the actual combat, so long as have a certain fulfillment, is encouraged by any form, all encourage enterprising motive force oneself.
Qian Gao under guide of me, resolve law of studying, work as lawyer, watch a lot of about law book and article of newspapers and periodicals while as a child. However, that is fighting only on paper.
16 year old come into court, participate in simulation court debate match, make her have an opportunity until oneself personally experience to law, further think deeply in life. Understand the detail that the law, court, lawyer and court hear a case tentatively, make her have an opportunity to personally experience, and in order to personally experience deeper introspection: Such work, such working environment, such a working rhythm, such life, it is exactly one's own ideal, whether pursue in one's own real one life?
The judicial procedure of American court competes with simulation to prove:
Syndication